This price difference has to be kept in mind when comparing the features. I remember paying more than $300 for Bryce 2.Į-On Software raised the prices of Vue 7 (compared to Vue 6) but does occasional promotions. Historically, Bryce was more expensive than it is now. Bryce is still one product while Vue is split in a whole range of different products. The other big difference is the pricing and product range. The evolution of these programs explains the fact that they now have quite different feature sets. Its new owner had to revamp its outdated code and added a few interesting features in version 6 (mainly IBL lighting). Bryce was then sold to Corel, which merely added a tree editor and other goodies to it. While Vue had a more or less linear development, with significant features being added with every version, the evolution of Bryce has slowed down considerably since Metacreations dropped it in December 1999. The main difference: Bryce product history Most of the time, they were later improved in Vue. Interestingly, many of these appeared first in Bryce and then appeared in Vue versions, sometimes in a disturbingly similar way.
They probably share more features that any other 3d application has. In fact, Bryce and Vue have a lot in common. Their modelling capacities are limited, but they are both able to import a wide range of 3d model formats, including Poser files. They are centered around scene building and rendering. This article is an attempt to summarize my findings in this respect.īryce and Vue are 3d landscape programs that can actually be used to make almost any kind of image.
My first tests in Vue were no more than a cautious exploration, but I quickly realized that it had lots of features I had been wanting in Bryce for years. I have used Bryce for a long time before switching - somewhat reluctantly - to Vue. TAGS: 3d benchmarks, DAZ Bryce 6, e-On Software Vue 7
0 kommentar(er)
